" education of the common people requires, perhaps, in a civilized and commercial society, the attention of the State over that of persons of rank and some luck .
" By spending very little the state can" facilitate "," encourage " and also "impose" on almost all the mass of the people need to learn these essential parts of education [reading, writing and arithmetic] "
" However, the State derives from their education offers considerable advantages . The more such classes are taught, and is not subject to illusions of fanaticism and superstition, which among ignorant people often give rise to the most terrible disorders. In addition, an intelligent and educated people is more decent and orderly manner of a stupid and ignorant. In it, everyone feels more respectable and more worthy of getting respect from his legitimate superiors, as well to be more willing to respect . "
exclusively funded public education and encouraged by the state at all levels, social and institutional duty and indisputable antidote to alienation and the evils of the market for it fair and meritocratic.
Whose words are these? Marx
you say ... or maybe because he has put Francis will be some other leftist-out.
No I'm sorry ... Adam Smith is (taken from his main work "Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations"), you
himself the father of the free market, minimal state, and economy of the invisible hand classical liberal!
Shocked ah? You should not because the problem is that with these ruling classes (I speak not only of the PDL or Italy) should be impossible for a right to be able to recognize. Their policies do not comply nemmemeno theories of liberalism, which is not desirable, but think about what level of absurdity we arrived. Policies against the public schools are simply anti-social, criminal and class for a despotic control of the masses. Before resuming the dialectical confrontation should make it clear even to people who profess to right what is right, we suggest the arguments on the opposing party because it is not even able to support them. Cabbage yet Fini also, which he says he is the true Italian right and not that selfish, illiberal Mafia B, voted in favor of the nth havoc against the school and the university.
But then so much out of curiosity, what do you think your Marx?
Be first to know:
" is not the consciousness of men that determines their being but their social being that determines their consciousness "
learn that the process of social, political and intellectual life is influenced by the structure economy. So what?
" education for all children beginning from the moment they can do without first maternal care, in national institutions and at the expense of the nation. "
" And your education is not determined by society? Is not determined by social relations within which you educate, by the interference more or less direct or indirect of society through the school and so on? The Communists have not the influence of society in education, they just change the character of that influence, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class. The phraseology of the bourgeois family and education, sull'affettuoso relationship between parents and children becomes more nauseating, as, due to of big industry, the proletariat is to tear all the family relationship, and children are transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor "
For Marx, therefore, is not only unacceptable but just a private education is concerned that education the State is affected by this structure and the hegemonic class. It will be then the revolution to create a truly free education from classes as a society.
So paradoxically, some doubt if he puts his left.
learn at least to get our roles for pleasure, I'm sick of phrases such as "Who's rooftop protest in a communist ideological and fanatical"
or who are squats down in tens of thousands in the streets.
Let's stop using "right" and "left" empty words as useful only to legitimate stage of Divisions and factions ignorant of the debate that is focused on only the gossip Berlusconi.
What an ugly feeling humiliated Policy ("the noblest of the arts" Aristotle) \u200b\u200bby people who are total ignorance and bad faith. Obviously I am not referring only to the populace or the guy who yells at the bar against the communists ... but the same ruling class that at least in contrast to the strategic interests of the populace has to say stupid things and destroy the serious debate. Their designs as we have seen on the subject of theoretical analysis and history behind it, is only the robbery of our bleak future for their own enrichment. But will be granted by this unjust system, but Let's face as soon as possible.
" By spending very little the state can" facilitate "," encourage " and also "impose" on almost all the mass of the people need to learn these essential parts of education [reading, writing and arithmetic] "
" However, the State derives from their education offers considerable advantages . The more such classes are taught, and is not subject to illusions of fanaticism and superstition, which among ignorant people often give rise to the most terrible disorders. In addition, an intelligent and educated people is more decent and orderly manner of a stupid and ignorant. In it, everyone feels more respectable and more worthy of getting respect from his legitimate superiors, as well to be more willing to respect . "
exclusively funded public education and encouraged by the state at all levels, social and institutional duty and indisputable antidote to alienation and the evils of the market for it fair and meritocratic.
Whose words are these? Marx
you say ... or maybe because he has put Francis will be some other leftist-out.
No I'm sorry ... Adam Smith is (taken from his main work "Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations"), you
himself the father of the free market, minimal state, and economy of the invisible hand classical liberal!
Shocked ah? You should not because the problem is that with these ruling classes (I speak not only of the PDL or Italy) should be impossible for a right to be able to recognize. Their policies do not comply nemmemeno theories of liberalism, which is not desirable, but think about what level of absurdity we arrived. Policies against the public schools are simply anti-social, criminal and class for a despotic control of the masses. Before resuming the dialectical confrontation should make it clear even to people who profess to right what is right, we suggest the arguments on the opposing party because it is not even able to support them. Cabbage yet Fini also, which he says he is the true Italian right and not that selfish, illiberal Mafia B, voted in favor of the nth havoc against the school and the university.
But then so much out of curiosity, what do you think your Marx?
Be first to know:
" is not the consciousness of men that determines their being but their social being that determines their consciousness "
learn that the process of social, political and intellectual life is influenced by the structure economy. So what?
" education for all children beginning from the moment they can do without first maternal care, in national institutions and at the expense of the nation. "
" And your education is not determined by society? Is not determined by social relations within which you educate, by the interference more or less direct or indirect of society through the school and so on? The Communists have not the influence of society in education, they just change the character of that influence, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class. The phraseology of the bourgeois family and education, sull'affettuoso relationship between parents and children becomes more nauseating, as, due to of big industry, the proletariat is to tear all the family relationship, and children are transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor "
For Marx, therefore, is not only unacceptable but just a private education is concerned that education the State is affected by this structure and the hegemonic class. It will be then the revolution to create a truly free education from classes as a society.
So paradoxically, some doubt if he puts his left.
learn at least to get our roles for pleasure, I'm sick of phrases such as "Who's rooftop protest in a communist ideological and fanatical"
or who are squats down in tens of thousands in the streets.
Let's stop using "right" and "left" empty words as useful only to legitimate stage of Divisions and factions ignorant of the debate that is focused on only the gossip Berlusconi.
What an ugly feeling humiliated Policy ("the noblest of the arts" Aristotle) \u200b\u200bby people who are total ignorance and bad faith. Obviously I am not referring only to the populace or the guy who yells at the bar against the communists ... but the same ruling class that at least in contrast to the strategic interests of the populace has to say stupid things and destroy the serious debate. Their designs as we have seen on the subject of theoretical analysis and history behind it, is only the robbery of our bleak future for their own enrichment. But will be granted by this unjust system, but Let's face as soon as possible.
- Francesco Strippoli
Tweet
0 comments:
Post a Comment